It would be highly desirable if bankers did rein in their excesses, of course. In my view, this is best done by the market mechanisms of punishing failure and ensuring the bankruptcy of failed institutions. Some of the reforms proposed in the wake of the crisis will improve matters in this respect, though I am sceptical about many of the measures being proposed by the ICB.
But what about the more general issue: is banking socially useless and should we be rebalancing our economy?
It is, in fact, difficult to imagine a modern economy without a large financial sector. The chattering classes and intellectuals often seem to think that it would be better if much more of the British workforce were engaged in manufacturing and we had fewer money-men supervising superfluous transactions that have nothing to do with the real business of creating wealth.
But life would be intolerable without banks. Not only do banks provide mechanisms to ensure that we can pay each other immediately for the goods and services we consume, they also provide crucial economic functions. These include screening risk, diversifying risk, reducing transaction costs and providing capital for businesses and credit for consumers. The flip side is that they also provide safe returns for savers. Without a modern financial system, retirement from work would be more-or-less impossible.
The costs and risks involved in investing, say, £10,000 without banks would be enormous. The lender would have to seek out potential borrowers. The lender would then have to check their credit worthiness and the viability of the projects in which they want to invest. All but the very rich would have little chance of diversifying their risk between different borrowers. And, without the mechanisms that banks use to maintain liquidity, lenders would have to wait years to get their money back. With a developed banking sector I only have to find a reliable bank and it will provide all these services. The bank screens the risk, ensures that risk is effectively diversified, reduces transaction costs and ensures that I can have my money back more or less when I like. There are corresponding benefits for borrowers, of course, who have cheaper and easier access to finance.
To read the full article please click on this link
This article originally appeared in the Autumn 2011 edition of Balance, the magazine of the British Bankers' Association




Click here for your free issue
comments
The costs and risks of investing say £10,000 without banks would NOT be enormous via an established P2P lending site such as Zopa. The transaction costs are lower than doing so via a bank as witnessed by the fact that both sides (lenders and borrowers) get a better deal than they would through a bank.
Risky? Our credit performance has been miles better than any bank over the last 6 years, with default rates below 0.9%, below the figure forecasted to lenders at the outset to allow them to set their rates.
Lenders can be diversified while only lending £500 so it is hardly for the very rich.
We can also provide liquidity to lenders (or savers) by allowing them to sell on their interests to others in a highly liquid marketplace, without adding structural risk into the system through leverage.
Seems a better model to me and criticism of bankers perfectly fair.
Practically 90% of the business banking market is dominated by just 5 high street banks. A lack of choice in financial products and a monopoly on capital distribution reduces the growth prospects for businesses burdened with unreasonable cost of finance.
Pushing for alternatives to the big institutions will add much needed competition in what is a reduced lending environment without providing any of the systemic risk to the markets of a bank which is 'too big to fail'.
MarketInvoice allows SMEs to get cash upfront on their invoices by auctioning them on an online marketplace. High net worth individuals and institutional investors place bids and advance cash to these companies in exchange for a small discount fee, which is driven down through a competitive auction process.
It's all very well saying the market is the best medicine, but the failure of Lehman Bros. proved such a shock to the global financial system that the prospect of another major bank imploding forced governments to act. Even those that took no public money were protected from the chain reaction by its being pumped ito weaker institutions.
The city really doesn't seem to have woken up to the fact that the sight of them conducting business as usual while being propped up by the public many of whom are unemployed or feeling the pinch is winning them few friends
RSS feed for comments to this post