I would like to put forward an argument.
Business owners with disabilities are forgotten despite their huge potential.
• 19% of the working age population are people with disabilities
• Very few people with disabilities actually seem to run businesses despite the clear correlation between certain disabilities (dyslexia) and successful entrepreneurship
This wasted opportunity is a disgrace.
It is great to see the build up towards the Paralympics. But thinking beyond the athletic events, are businesses run by people with disabilities proportionately represented in the business community?
The Paralympics website talks a lot about diversity and inclusion and yet there is an absence of defining who is or is not a paralympic athlete. Very strange. Surely, the Paralympics celebrates the elite performances of athletes who are disabled or challenged. I think that is the case. It is difficult to know from the website. I had to go to Wikipedia to get a better understanding.
So, enough waffle. My point is pretty straightforward.
According to The Disability Living Foundation (http://www.dlf.org.uk/content/key-facts), 19% of the working population are described as people with disabilities – that’s 6.9 million people.
If 19% of the working age population is disabled, then, all things being equal, some 19% of small businesses should be run by people with disabilities. This is not the case.
You could round that figure down to 15%. In that case, I would like to believe that some 15% of the 4 million small businesses (ie 600,000 businesses) would be run by individuals with disabilities. Even that is not the case.
Some personal evidence. In the last 10 business seminar events that I ran I saw 1,000 small business people. I am only aware of maybe five individuals who had overtly recognisable ‘special needs’ (a requirement for disabled access, poor sight and poor hearing issues). So, we could add maybe another 10 or 20 to that number for those people attending who had less obvious needs. Even then we’d only have 2.5% and not the anticipated 15%. It seems that the population with disabilities and small business rarely go together.
I realise that some disabilities are less visible. There is a history of associating dyslexia with entrepreneurship. Articles such as Why Dyslexics Make Great Entrepreneurs argue that the ‘disability’ may actually be an asset. There’s even a Top 30 of Dyslexic Entrepreneurs including Ford, Branson, Hewlett, Jobs, Wrigley, Spielberg, Hilfiger, Woolworth, Disney, Rockefeller, Watson, Edison, Roddick, and Bell… not a bad roster. Again, the man or woman on the street is probably not aware of what an impressive list this is. It contains six of my business heroes!!! So, some disabilities do go with entrepreneurship. However, I am not sure if being dyslexic qualifies you for the Paralympics.
And now for the big BUT…!!!
It is agreed that the real skill in running a great business is in the thinking, design and planning. Working on the business, not just in it. Spotting an opportunity… marshalling the resources and making things happen. Thinking outside the box. This is probably why dyslexics can make great entrepreneurs. So, leaving out all the possible excuses, I still don’t understand why there are not more businesses run by people with disabilities.
In fact, with all this fuss about Paralympics, why isn’t there a fuss being made about businesses run by people with disabilities? An opportunity for Entrepreneur Country?
So much for the Equalities Act and the rest of the rhetoric, it is time for someone to represent and lobby and fight for the opportunity for people with disabilities to run their own businesses.
We see plenty of media coverage for the paralympic athletes. Maybe it is time to create the parabusiness awards?




Get your free June Issue of Entrepreneur Country Magazine in the format best for you!
comments
Robert Willis - thank you for your kind words. I think this is an important issue. But ignored as far as I can see.
RC
I agree:
So para-business should not be about people with sight, hearing, mobility or other issues. It should be about people who are disabled in a way which would otherwise exclude them from business, for example in their ability to add, or plan, or sell, or talk to other people as if they were human beings. It should be for people who run businesses despite being obviously at a severe disadvantage in a key ability to do so
There is confusion over the dylexia as a disability and the edges of the paralympics and what qualifies.
My real beef is about why paralympics makes such a fuss about athletes with disabilities... BUT we make little or no fuss/mention/help for business owners who may have disabilities.
Robert
I have posted a more in-depth comment on your G+ due to the comment length limitations here.
Ruth
https://plus.google.com/u/0/108572118043710218731/posts/X3TQdArwa3q
RC
My pleasure and thanks for taking the time to comment.
Robert
RSS feed for comments to this post